(May 26, 2021) – Two National Capital Region courts have thrown out separate motions challenging the validity of search warrants used against four activists arrested in December, contradicting an earlier ruling of another local court that freed a journalist and a trade union organizer, lawyers said on Tuesday.
The Manila Regional Trial Court Branch 50 and the Quezon City Regional Trial Court Branch 91 had found sufficient evidence to back the legality of the search warrants, which the police used to search for guns in the homes of trade union organizers who were arrested.
Activists Joel Demate, Mark Ryan Cruz, Romina Riaselle Astudillo, and Jaymie Gregorio were facing trials for illegal possession of firearms and explosives, a non-bailable crime that they repeatedly denied. They said the police planted the weapons as evidence against them.
“There exists substantial evidence to support the issuance of the search warrant in these cases,” Manila Judge Bibiano Colasito said in a decision dismissing Demate’s motion last May 18.
“Verily, at this early, if based merely upon the record, and notwithstanding the alleged discrepancies or inadequacies in the statements of the applicant and his witnesses, it cannot be determined with certitude that the applicant and his witnesses prevaricated the truth as the same needs further scrutiny from the court.”
Similarly, Quezon City Judge Kathleen Rosario Dela Cruz-Espinosa arrived at the same decision, which was released on April 12, affirming the warrant against the three other activists was based on probable cause.
Cruz-Espinosa said there is no “hard-and-fast rule” in examining applications for search warrants in response to the groups’ challenge to the procedure employed by Executive Judge Cecilyn Burgos-Villavert in issuing the legal document.
She also rejected the argument saying law enforcers went overboard by taking equipment not clearly stated in the search warrant, ruling these objects should still be admissible before the court.
“The additional items seized, although not described or provided in the search warrant, are either recovered in plain view of the police officers or bear direct relation to the offense for which the same was issued,” Espinosa said, “thus, must not be suppressed or rendered inadmissible.”
Both decisions were released only on Tuesday.
In a press briefing, the National Union of Peoples’ Lawyers slammed the junking of the two recent motions, which was largely different from the decision earlier released by another judge.
“Ano ba ‘yung nakita ng Mandaluyong court na hindi makita o ayaw tingnan ng trial courts dito sa Manila at Quezon City?” asked lawyer Kathy Panguban, one of the activists’ legal counsels. “Ito po ang mind-boggling sa aming lahat na tumatayong legal counsel sa mga natitirang [inaresto].”
All four labor organizers were arrested in almost simultaneous police operations conducted during the International Human Rights Day last December, along with two other activists and one journalist. Only Dennise Velasco has yet to file his motion to quash.
Manila Today editor Lady Ann Salem and trade activist Rodrigo Esparago were released in March after a Mandaluyong court granted the motion they filed last year, slamming the vagueness of the warrant of arrest implemented by the police during the raid.
Judge Monique Quisumbing-Ignacio, who penned the ruling, was red-tagged after releasing her decision.
Human rights groups have repeatedly pressed the Supreme Court to act on the questionable warrants used to raid homes and offices of activist groups, saying law enforcers weaponize this legal route to clamp down on dissent.
In response, the high court plans to release an issue surrounding the use of body cameras in legitimate police operations which they believe would add a layer of protection to the accused.
(Beatrice Puente/MM)
Our Privacy Commitment
TV5 Network Inc. values and respects your privacy. We are committed to safeguarding your personal data in compliance with Republic Act No. 10173 or the Data Privacy Act of 2012 and its implementing rules and regulations.
We have developed a Privacy Policy that adopts and observes appropriate standards for personal data protection. While our Privacy Policy sets out the general principles governing the collection, use, and disclosure of our users’ personal information, our Privacy Commitment seeks to inform you more about TV5’s privacy practices.
Why do we collect your personal information (as applicable)?
We may collect and maintain basic information about you as site user of TV5 sites for the following purposes:
Where do we get your personal information?
There are several ways we collect your personal information.
Information that you personally provided.
Most of the personal information we have are those that you have provided us when you:
Information we collect during your engagement with us
We also collect information as you use our products and services, like:
Information we collect from other sources
Other means of collection of information may be through:
When do we disclose personal information?
There may be instances when we are required to share the information you provided us. In such cases, we ensure that your personal information will be disclosed on a confidential manner, through secure channels and in compliance with the Data Privacy Act and other privacy laws.
We will never share, rent, or sell your personal information to third parties outside of TV5 except in special cases where you have given consent, and in cases described in our privacy policy.
In some instances, we may be required to disclose your personal information to our agents, subsidiaries, affiliates, business partners and other third-party agencies and service providers as part of our regular business operations and for the provision of our programs and services. This means we might share your information with our service providers, contractors, and professional advisers who help us provide our services.
How we protect your personal information
The integrity, confidentiality, and security of your information is important to us. We have implemented technical, organizational, and physical security measures that are designed to protect your information from unauthorized or fraudulent access, alteration, disclosure, misuse, and other unlawful activities.
We also put in effect the following safeguards:
TV5 will not collect, use, or disclose your personal information for any purpose other than the purpose that you may have given your consent for.
What are your choices?
We make sure that we have your consent to continue to collect, use, and disclose your personal information for the purposes that we have identified. We want you to know that you may object or withdraw your consent and/or edit your consent preferences at any time.
If you wish to have access to the personal information in our custody or if you think that the personal information you provided is incomplete, or otherwise inaccurate, you may get in touch with our Data Protection Officer through the contact details provided below. In some instances, we may request for supporting documents or proof before we effect requested changes.
Data Protection Officer
TV5 Network Inc.
Reliance corner Sheridan Streets
Mandaluyong City
tv5dataprivacy@tv5.com.ph
What happens when there are changes in our Policy?
From time to time, we may update our privacy policy and practices to comply with changes in applicable laws and regulatory requirements, adapt to new technologies and protocols, and align with the best practices of the industry.
You will be provided notices if the changes are significant and, if we are required by law, we will obtain your updated consent.