By Manny Mogato
Salvador Medialdea, the former executive secretary in the Duterte administration, firmly denied the “gentleman’s agreement” between the former president and China’s leader Xi Jinping.
The two met more than six times when Rodrigo Duterte was in power from 2016 to 2022. They again met once after Duterte left Malacañan.
Medialdea did not only deny the verbal deal under Duterte, he also pointed to another deal struck during the Benigno Aquino III administration. He pointed to former defense secretary Voltaire Gazmin, who agreed with the Chinese embassy to bring only food and fresh water to troops stationed at BRP Sierra Madre, sometime in 2013.
Medialdea said he learned about the deal 12 days after Duterte was sworn into office in July 2016, only days before the Permanent Court of Arbitration in The Hague made a ruling that repudiated China’s nine-dash-line and awarded the Philippines economic rights in the West Philippine Sea under the 1982 United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS).
Medialdea said the Duterte government respected the deal made by Gazmin and kept the status. But, there were flaws in Medialdea’s testimony before the House Committee on National Defense and Security.
First, Medialdea needed to produce a copy of the agreement entered into by Gazmin with the Chinese embassy.
Second, his testimony is primarily hearsay from someone he could no longer remember. It is a convenient excuse.
Third, former defense secretary Delfin Lorenzana denied any knowledge about Gazmin’s deal. Gazmin dd not inform him about the supposed deal if there was any.
Fourth, he passed the buck to a previous administration to clear Duterte of any wrongdoing.
Medialdea also needed to remember fundamental details about the relations between the Philippines and China.
The Philippines had filed an arbitration case against China in early 2013, a move that angered Beijing as contacts between the two states were reduced. If there was an agreement on the bringing of supplies to BRP Sierra Madre, how could China have prevented the wooden supply boat from carrying out its mission during that time?
The international and local media were reporting China’s shadowing and blocking of a civilian supply vessel from reaching Ayungin Shoal. During that time, in 2013, there were already rumors swirling in the local media about the repairs made inside BRP Sierra Madre to prevent it from disintegrating, almost 15 years after it rank aground on the submerged shoal.
Reuters, in an exclusive report in July 2015, finally reported about the repairs based on interviews with two officers, including a general. Ambassador Charles Jose, a foreign affairs undersecretary who was a spokesman at that time, declined to comment about the repairs but emphasized if the military decides to do it, it was not illegal under the 2002 Declaration of Conduct of Parties in the South China Sea, an informal code of conduct signed by China and the 10-member Association of Southeast Asian Nation (ASEAN) in Phnom Penh.
China tried adhering to the code by not occupying any new feature in the South China Sea. It also built artificial islands only on the features it already occupied.
The 2002 DOC stands, although there were still blatant violations by China, like excessive reclamations and converting the reefs and shoals into military fortresses with ports and airfields. The reclamation and construction also began in early 2013, activities which the Philippines and other Southeast Asian states protested. In 2013, relations between Manila and Beijing were getting sour and shaky. Is an agreement on Ayungin Shoal is feasible during that time.
The tense situation in the West Philippine Sea began in 2011 when Chinese warships stopped a private exploration vessel hired by n Anglo-Filipino company to test oil and gas fields in the Reed Bank. The following year, there was a standoff in Bajo de Masinloc when BRP Gregorio del Pilar tried to arrest Chinese fishermen who were rescued by China’s Coast Guard. This would show that relations between China and the Philippines slowly deteriorated even before a supposed deal on the Ayungin Shoal was forged.
In any case, Medialdea was lying and trying to deflect the blame on Duterte. Despite outright denials by three former Duterte officials — Medialdea, Lorenzana, and former National Security Adviser Hermogenes Esperon — the “gentleman’s agreement” was confirmed by Duterte’s former spokesman, lawyer Harry Roque.
It is unclear what was Roque’s motive for revealing a secret deal between the former president and the Chinese leader. Why was Roque mouthing a Chinese propaganda? Beijing’s foreign ministry and its embassy in Manila have been insisting about the existence of a “gentleman’s agreement.”
It was not pointing to the administration of former president Aquino. However, China has also been insisting about separate new deals with the Marcos administration — the one struck by Ambassador Teodoro Locsin, Jr. in September 2023 and with another DFA official early this year.
These two agreements under Marcos would be better discussed in another column.
The absence of a written document about the gentleman’s agreement between Xi and Duterte would be difficult to prove. However, it should be enough that Duterte himself had admitted that he had a verbal agreement with Xi.
Our Privacy Commitment
TV5 Network Inc. values and respects your privacy. We are committed to safeguarding your personal data in compliance with Republic Act No. 10173 or the Data Privacy Act of 2012 and its implementing rules and regulations.
We have developed a Privacy Policy that adopts and observes appropriate standards for personal data protection. While our Privacy Policy sets out the general principles governing the collection, use, and disclosure of our users’ personal information, our Privacy Commitment seeks to inform you more about TV5’s privacy practices.
Why do we collect your personal information (as applicable)?
We may collect and maintain basic information about you as site user of TV5 sites for the following purposes:
Where do we get your personal information?
There are several ways we collect your personal information.
Information that you personally provided.
Most of the personal information we have are those that you have provided us when you:
Information we collect during your engagement with us
We also collect information as you use our products and services, like:
Information we collect from other sources
Other means of collection of information may be through:
When do we disclose personal information?
There may be instances when we are required to share the information you provided us. In such cases, we ensure that your personal information will be disclosed on a confidential manner, through secure channels and in compliance with the Data Privacy Act and other privacy laws.
We will never share, rent, or sell your personal information to third parties outside of TV5 except in special cases where you have given consent, and in cases described in our privacy policy.
In some instances, we may be required to disclose your personal information to our agents, subsidiaries, affiliates, business partners and other third-party agencies and service providers as part of our regular business operations and for the provision of our programs and services. This means we might share your information with our service providers, contractors, and professional advisers who help us provide our services.
How we protect your personal information
The integrity, confidentiality, and security of your information is important to us. We have implemented technical, organizational, and physical security measures that are designed to protect your information from unauthorized or fraudulent access, alteration, disclosure, misuse, and other unlawful activities.
We also put in effect the following safeguards:
TV5 will not collect, use, or disclose your personal information for any purpose other than the purpose that you may have given your consent for.
What are your choices?
We make sure that we have your consent to continue to collect, use, and disclose your personal information for the purposes that we have identified. We want you to know that you may object or withdraw your consent and/or edit your consent preferences at any time.
If you wish to have access to the personal information in our custody or if you think that the personal information you provided is incomplete, or otherwise inaccurate, you may get in touch with our Data Protection Officer through the contact details provided below. In some instances, we may request for supporting documents or proof before we effect requested changes.
Data Protection Officer
TV5 Network Inc.
Reliance corner Sheridan Streets
Mandaluyong City
tv5dataprivacy@tv5.com.ph
What happens when there are changes in our Policy?
From time to time, we may update our privacy policy and practices to comply with changes in applicable laws and regulatory requirements, adapt to new technologies and protocols, and align with the best practices of the industry.
You will be provided notices if the changes are significant and, if we are required by law, we will obtain your updated consent.